Dan Nejfelt, Faith in Public Life’s Messaging and Trainings Manager, worked at Sojourners magazine as part of his graduate study of journalism at the University of Missouri before coming to FPL. Prior to that, he taught remedial reading and writing to 7th and 8th graders in rural Arkansas as a Teach For America corps member. Dan blogs about health care, the Religious Right and budget issues.
The ongoing debate in the Georgia state capitol about bills labeled “religious freedom” legislation has been moving fast and marred by misleading arguments. Contrary to claims made by supporters, the bills in question — H.B. 218 and H.B. 29 — are unnecessary, divisive and dangerous. Here’s some coverage of the debate and analysis of the legislation that cuts to the heart of the matter.
Legal scholars against the Teasley bill
A letter from 18 distinguished legal scholars to Governor Deal and the Leadership of the Georgia Legislature detailing objections and concerns regarding the “Preventing Government Overreach on Religious Expression Act.”
Religious liberty law needed? Unintened consequences skew freedom
By Peter Berg and David Key Sr., Atlanta Journal-Constitution
An op-ed by faith leaders explaining that their commitment to religious freedom informs their opposition to this legislation.
Religious Freedom Proposal in Georgia Draws Baptists into Debate
By Don Byrd, Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty
The BJC, the church’s foremost authority on religious freedom, raises questions about the legislation and notes that the organization officially opposed a similar bill in Georgia last year.
Religious freedom bill misnamed and unnecessary
By K. David Cooke, Jr., The Macon Telegraph
Cooke, the district attorney for the Macon judicial circuit and a member of the Baptist Committee for Religious Liberty’s board of directors, explains some incredibly dangerous potential consequences of passing this legislation.
Atlanta fire chief fired after calling gays ‘vile’ claims religious bias
By Jenny Jarvie, Los Angeles Times
Supporters point to the firing of Atlanta Fire Chief Kelvin Cochran as proof that the legislation is necessary. This story shows that Cochran was fired for violating workplace policy, defying orders from the mayor, exposing the city to lawsuits, and creating a hostile work environment — not because of his religion.
add a comment »
Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) has a well-earned reputation as a politician who uses faith
to justify policies that kick struggling families when they’re down. So it’s hardly surprising that his remarks about poverty at the Conservative Political Action Conference today included religious and moral arguments. Raw Story has the footage
It’s interesting that he accuses safety-net supporters of offering “a full stomach and an empty soul.” As a Catholic, is Ryan accusing nuns and the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops of advancing an agenda of spiritual bankruptcy? I ask because these leaders vocally defend protections like SNAP and extended unemployment insurance that help hard-hit families put food on the table.
And Ryan’s remarks about families that count on free school lunches are just as troubling. I taught in a school where most students received free or reduced-price lunches. Much like kids at middle-class schools across the country, I’m sure many of them would’ve preferred a homemade meal over the cafeteria cuisine. But Ryan’s suggestion that the 31 million American children who get free or reduced-price lunches aren’t “cared for” by their parents is contemptuous and foolish. Ryan, who is a millionaire, appears to be completely out of touch with the struggles and sacrifices of families trying to get by on the $290 a week that a minimum wage worker brings home.
Ryan should stop pontificating about low-income families — and stop trying to make it even harder for them to meet their most basic needs.
add a comment »
While I marched alongside 80,000 people at Saturday’s Moral March in Raleigh, North Carolina, I couldn’t help but feel I was witnessing a struggle for justice that will go down in history. The flurry of destructive, regressive state laws passed over the last year demanded an overwhelming moral response, and that’s what’s happening.
I watched Rev. William Barber II’s rousing keynote address from the roof of a six-story parking garage roughly 150 yards from the main stage. As if written in the script, halfway through his speech the sun came out and shined over the impassioned crowd that stretched more than four city blocks.
Rather than try to recapture now what it felt like, here’s what caught my eye, rang in my ears and stirred in my heart as the march unfolded:
add a comment »
Faith leaders are deeply involved with the Medicaid expansion fight in Ohio, where key GOP legislators who support extending health coverage to 300,000 low-income Ohio families, children and seniors are facing political intimidation from right-wing groups. Americans For Prosperity, a Tea Party group financed by the Koch brothers, has launched attack ads against Rep. Barbara Sears and other Republican lawmakers across the state who are putting the health of struggling Ohioans before the political agenda of the Tea Party.
Our friends at Nuns on the Bus Ohio have mobilized Catholic Sisters statewide to confront these attacks. As a result of their diligence and conviction, more than 140 Sisters have released a hard-hitting statement calling on the Koch Brothers to search their souls about their opposition to Medicaid Expansion, saying in part
We know from our ministry to those living on the margins that a lack of health care is a constant burden that unnecessarily weighs on families. Medicaid expansion will provide immediate relief.
Sadly, wealthy activists are organizing in Ohio and across the country to deny health care coverage to pregnant women, the disabled and elderly in nursing homes by undermining Medicaid expansion. Americans for Prosperity, the advocacy group backed by the billionaire brothers Charles and David Koch, has made this a top priority. This is unconscionable. It is shameful that billionaires who can access the best medical care in the world oppose basic health care for the poor. We urge these corporate leaders to search their souls, consider the pain of so many families and stop this reckless campaign.
The economic and moral arguments for Medicaid expansion are strong enough to unite groups that normally find themselves on opposite sides of debates. For example, the Ohio Hospital Association and the labor union SEIU, as well as Ohio Right to Life Organization and NARAL Pro-Choice Ohio, have joined forces in support of Republican Governor Kasich’s decision to expand Medicaid. Kasich himself cited his faith as an inspiration for his position.
add a comment »
On the five-year anniversary of the Wall Street crisis that triggered the worst economic collapse since the Great Depression, millions of Americans remain trapped in poverty and not a single Wall Street leader has been prosecuted for their irresponsible behavior.
This week the Census Bureau released data showing that more than 46 million Americans were living in poverty in 2012 – the same as 2011. While our economy has shown some signs of improvement, it’s primarily the very wealthy who are reaping the rewards, and wage-earning Americans have been steadily losing ground over the past few decades.
And if not for key safety-net programs, millions more Americans struggling to find work in a weak economy would have fallen below the poverty line. The Census figures definitively show that Social Security, unemployment insurance, and SNAP lifted more than 40 million Americans out of poverty last year. (For a deep dive into the numbers, check out Robert Greenstein and Melissa Boteach’s analyses.)
SNAP is a critical lifeline for millions of seniors, children, disabled Americans, and the working poor, but it’s under immediate threat from conservatives in the House of Representatives. Today, the House will vote on a bill that not only cuts SNAP by almost $40 billion, but would also leave almost 4 million desperately poor Americans looking for both work and food.
This is very much a values debate. On the one hand, faith groups like the Circle of Protection have lined up in strong opposition to these immoral cuts. On the other, proponents of cutting SNAP have taken Scripture badly out of context to argue that taking nutrition supports away from poor people is consistent with Christian values. Just yesterday, when challenged by faith leaders, Congressman Stephen Fincher (R-TN) refused to retract the claim he made in May, when he cited two Bible verses to justify letting the poor go without food. Read more about that here.
add a comment »