Today’s Los Angeles Times ran an editorial under the headline “The real issues of election 2008” calling for economic and security issues to take precedence in the presidential campaign:
Last year, Sen. John McCain finished last in a Republican presidential poll held in conjunction with the [Values Voter] summit. This year’s summiteers were newly enthusiastic about McCain because of his selection of their kindred spirit, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, as his running mate. Some of the faithful hope that the 2008 election will be a referendum on “values” — as defined by them.
We hope they’re wrong. A raft of issues will confront the next president: the faltering economy, Iraq, Afghanistan, the nuclear ambitions of Iran and North Korea, a resurgent Russia, gaps in health insurance, energy policy and climate change. Especially after this week’s turmoil in the financial markets, it’s bizarre to suggest that this election should turn on abortion, same-sex marriage or the relationship between church and state. Though these remain important issues, the electorate would be the loser if they play as significant a role this year as they have in recent presidential races.
I guess I’d half agree with this. The more we focus on issues outside the culture wars, the better off we’ll be, but we can’t just wish wedge issues away. We need an alternative framework. Long wars typically don’t end until one or both sides more or less run out of bullets, and as much as I’ve enjoyed watching the Religious Right’s influence wane, their munitions factories are still humming along. I don’t have the solution, but I think a good starting point is deciding whether we’re trying to end the war or trying to win it. It is an important distinction, and one that each of us who care about politics owe ourselves to ask. I for one don’t think this war can end in victory — for either side.
add a comment »
Yesterday numerous religious leaders called on candidates for public office (not just the presidentials) to make poverty a more urgent priority. A group of more than 100 called specifically for relief and rebuilding on the hurricane- and poverty-ravaged Gulf Coast:
In an attempt to solve what they called a “moral crisis,” the religious leaders sent the statement to national leaders of both parties to urge them to restore the Gulf Coast communities by creating resident-led partnerships that will enable residents to help rebuild their communities.
The statement also called for government officials to increase federal and state funding for affordable housing and coastal wetland restoration, and to implement a flood control system to protect the communities from future severe weather.
The statement and full list of signatories is here.
And in Washington, DC,
Praying outside the U.S. Capitol Sept. 16, Catholic, Protestant, Islamic and Jewish leaders invoked the words of the prophet Micah in calling upon candidates for public office in the Nov. 4 election to join with Americans of faith concerned about the growing poverty in the U.S. to work for justice for the poor.
It’s important to make these statements right now. A new administration and a new Congress will take the reins before we know it, and they’ll put the most energy into the issues they hear about most from voters. If we don’t put poverty on their radar, they’ll do exactly nada about it. With faith leaders asking en masse, and in some cases face to face, the candidates and electeds won’t be able put poverty on the back burner or sweep it under the rug as they have for decades.
add a comment »
The Fighting Poverty WIth Faith Week of Action discussed earlier has their own blog, which features an audio recording yesterday’s press teleconference kickoff. On the call are JCPA Executive Director Rabbi Steve Gutow, Reps. John Lewis and Rosa DeLauro, Rev. Clarence Williams of Catholic Charities, and Dr. Jared Bernstein from the Economic Policy Institute. As a whole, they lay out the moral, theological, historical, political and strategic frameworks for cutting poverty drastically right now. Have a listen for some illuminating observations about how we can and why we must.
add a comment »
Yesterday, a nationwide interfaith campaign to increase the emphasis on poverty in the ’08 election kicked off:
Faith leaders from 21 national organizations, led by the Jewish Council for Public Affairs and Catholic Charities USA, have joined forces to spend a week urging local, state and national politicians to make anti-poverty efforts a top priority.
Called “Fighting Poverty with Faith: A Week of Action,” the grass-roots effort includes a range of activities, from a poverty symposium in Nashville, Tenn., to a letter-writing campaign in Rhode Island. The week culminates with a Sept. 16 gathering on the steps of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.
With the McCain and Obama campaigns heading into the final two months before Election Day, Rabbi Steve Gutow, executive director of the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, said the interfaith coalition can “hold the candidates responsible” for coming up with strategies to help the 37 million Americans who live below the federal poverty line.
To be fair, both party platforms address domestic poverty (albeit with rather different approaches and degrees of emphasis). But it’s hard to argue that it’s received due attention. Smart, dedicated people in the interfaith advocacy world have put a tremendous amount of effort into putting poverty back on the agenda. Their energy, and the faith-driven dedication of religious communities across the country, can make the difference. Poverty is a moral issue, and a far more important topic than how many houses John McCain has or whether Barack Obama called Sarah Palin a pig.
add a comment »
Words become cheap currency on the campaign trail. They’re thrown about, dissected and retracted to the point that some voters judge them meaningless. But action is always preceded by words.
Setting the stage for real solutions on poverty, a diverse group of religious leaders has put the candidates on notice that their words matter. They’re telling Sens. McCain and Obama that mere lip service to this moral issue just won’t do.
Nine prominent faith leaders who lead organizations representing millions of people, inspired by their shared values, sent a letter to both presidential campaigns asking that each nominating convention include a primetime speech on poverty and each candidate deliver a plan “to address poverty and opportunity in America over the next decade.”
The letter recognizes that the government and faith communities must work together to turn the tide:
As people of faith, we believe that it is immoral to ignore our nation’s most vulnerable populations. As Americans, we believe enduring poverty undermines our country’s economic strength and prosperity. Every day, faith organizations serve individuals in need within our communities. But our efforts to sustain our brothers and sisters living in poverty must be complemented with a serious plan from our political leaders to reduce the number of needy.
This partnership is specifically laid out in their call to the candidates:
In the weeks leading up to the election, the interfaith community will be mobilizing our networks and starting a national conversation in churches, synagogues, and mosques–in the shelters and soup kitchens of our faith-based service providers, and among people of faith across our great nation. We will be drawing from our shared scriptures and commitment to our fellow beings, working to build the political and public will to combat poverty in the United States. We hope you will do the same from the podium at your party’s convention this summer.
Focusing on poverty is not just a moral imperative for the candidates—it also makes good political sense. With $4 gas, rising food costs and the continuing shame of 47 million Americans without health care, our national senses are unusually heightened to the threat of poverty. Whoever our next president is must actively engage poverty now and going forward; people of faith will be listening.
add a comment »