The election results are in, and underlying the tales of victory and defeat is a darker story about the mood of our nation. Many Americans feel neither political party speaks to their increasing struggle to make ends meet.
The exit polls paint a bleak picture. Almost half of voters reported that they expect life for the next generation of Americans to be worse. This pessimistic view is at the highest point since pollsters began asking this question in 1996. And 63% said our economic system favors of the wealthy. More than 70% fear a major terrorist attack.
While voters might have little faith in their elected leaders’ ability to improve our nation’s future, I wouldn’t interpret their disaffection as indifference toward the common good. Voters approved numerous ballot measures on Tuesday that will immediately help struggling workers and families –minimum wage increases in four states and two major cities, as well as four paid sick leave ballot initiatives.
The faith community is uniquely positioned to connect with people’s positive values and shape a new moral vision for our economy and politics. I saw many examples with my own eyes during this election cycle and heard inspiring stories from FPL staff working in numerous states.
In Georgia, which was saturated with negative ads, FPL lifted the civil discourse by enabling politically, religiously and racially diverse religious leaders to challenge the gubernatorial candidates to implement a common good agenda — and broadcast that vision statewide. In a state marred by a massive voter suppression effort, our organizers mounted a “Faithful Voter” mobilization program that equipped 150 clergy in African-American communities with best practices to encourage their church members to vote. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that 30% of Georgia voters on Tuesday were African-American.
FPL’s communications team spent much of the campaign season on the road providing strategic media support for the Nuns on the Bus tour. Over their journey across dozens of communities in 11 states, thousands of Americans — clergy, lay leaders and concerned citizens — came out to hear the Sisters’ message about the importance and power of voting in an era when megadonors seek to buy elections. I was especially proud to see Sr. Simone Campbell and fellow Sisters delivering this call on local television, newspaper and radio in city after city. Even jaded reporters were moved by Nuns on the Bus’s hopeful message.
There’s no denying that fear and anger are coursing through the American electorate right now, but it’s not the whole story. Addressing this problem will take time, effort, resources and organizing. But faith leaders are already taking steps in the right direction, and it gives me hope.
add a comment »
When it comes to political campaigns, what voters need and what they’re given are often very different things. The constant stream of negative ads, dishonesty on the campaign trail, and the outsized influence of big money drown out substantive discussion of the issues that affect us all.
However, faith leaders have a unique ability to offer a positive alternative and a better values debate that emphasizes justice, compassion and the common good. I saw it firsthand last week in Atlanta, Georgia, where clergy from across the state held the Georgia Faith Forum with Governor Nathan Deal (R) and his Democratic challenger, State Senator Jason Carter. Organized by Faith in Public Life and held in the beautiful sanctuary of Trinity Presbyterian Church and produced for broadcast by Atlanta’s WSB-TV, the forum featured 14 diverse faith leaders asking the candidates in-depth questions on issues ranging from healthcare to immigration policy to gun violence to criminal justice reform. These are issues that faith leaders are uniting to address — a values agenda for a new era in faith and politics.
But the first question asked of each candidate delved deeper: “You and your opponent both share the same faith, but you hold very different policy positions; how does your faith, as opposed to your political ideology, shape your views?” From then on, both candidates wove together their values and their policy positions in a way that voters don’t often hear.
I spoke with many clergy members of the Georgia Faith Forum board after the event, and while none agreed with every last thing they heard from the candidates, they remarked at how illuminating and unique the discussion was.
You can watch the Forum in its entirety here, or a brief overview of what it was all about here.
add a comment »
“True peace is not merely the absence of tension; it is the presence of justice.”
– Martin Luther King, Jr.
The tear gas has cleared from the streets of Ferguson, the National Guard has withdrawn, and Michael Brown has been laid to rest. But building true peace will take a long time.
Faith leaders began this process during the protests. Members of Clergy United, a 200-person St. Louis-area interfaith coalition, helped keep demonstrations nonviolent, counseled many outraged young residents, and provided a channel of communication between law enforcement and protesters.
Leaders from the PICO National Network, the Christian Community Development Association, Sojourners and numerous other groups went to Ferguson and helped the community channel heartbreak into constructive action. FPL organized an open letter from more than 300 faith leaders to the town’s police, mayor and citizens. The National African-American Clergy Network coalition released a powerful statement and set up a fund for Brown’s family.
It will take sustained effort and substantive change to achieve true peace. Independent, transparent investigations of both Brown’s killing and Ferguson law enforcement practices are necessary. Residents must become politically empowered to ensure real reform. Congregations must continue to organize disenfranchised residents and heal the wounds of racism. All of that will take a lot of work, but the leadership the faith community has already shown gives me hope.
add a comment »
The following is a guest post from one of FPL’s summer interns, Justin Massey. Justin is a senior at Wheaton College in Illinois.
“Sanctity of life” is a phrase we hear often in Christian circles. As people of faith, we believe that life is valuable and precious, and as the Bible states in Genesis1:27, we are all created in God’s own image. Yet, we sometimes fail to live up to our commitment to protect all lives, which are sacred. When tragedy hits a community outside of our own, we feel discomfort, yet rationalize inaction. We justify silence and complacency by characterizing the vulnerable as strangers. We characterize these individuals as just different enough to stifle our sense of urgency to act.
We are faced with a solvable but serious humanitarian issue in the United States, as children fleeing violent, dangerous environments in Central and South America seek safety within our borders. While there are some in the faith community who have stepped up to protect the lives of these vulnerable children, others’ fear outweighs their commitment to compassionate action. As Christians called to protect the sanctity of life, we should aspire to be more Christ-like in our response to this crisis, seeking to care for the children first, rather than criticizing our government and our broken immigration system.
As a millennial, I don’t just embrace a nation that is becoming increasingly diverse. Rather, I rejoice in it. From childhood to now, many of my closest friends, classmates and co-workers have been individuals from minority racial and ethnic backgrounds. 1 in five millennials within the U.S. are of Hispanic descent. This diversity allows for a complex cultural exchange that is worth celebrating. My generation is characterized by a pursuit of compassion and understanding despite differences. When we look at the vulnerable children entering the United States, we don’t see strangers. We see a reflection of our modern, beautifully diverse community, full of lives that are valuable and worth protecting. “Sanctity of life” refers to the sanctity of all lives. In Matthew 19:14, Jesus showed special care when he said, “Let the little children come to me…for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these.” As we seek to be more like Christ, let us come together as people of faith to wholeheartedly commit ourselves to love and protect all of God’s children.
add a comment »
If you’re a longtime Bold Faith Type reader, you know FPL and a broad range of faith leaders have sharply criticized Rep. Paul Ryan for authoring federal budgets that devastate seniors and struggling families, and forcefully rebuked him for using inaccurate theological arguments to defend this agenda. So I watched with keen interest last Thursday when Ryan released a set of anti-poverty proposals.
The plan included a few good policies, such as expansion of the Earned Income Tax Credit and criminal justice reforms that have bipartisan support, while avoiding some of the immoral safety-net cuts for which Ryan is well known. This is progress.
But the proposal also contained measures that would harm the people Ryan says he wants to help. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities warns that the “Opportunity Grants” at the heart of his plan would undermine housing assistance and SNAP. These vital supports for struggling families already accomplish Ryan’s stated goal of lifting millions of Americans out of poverty. Radically overhauling them makes no sense.
And the day after unveilling these policies, Ryan voted to end the Child Tax Credit for millions of working families who make less than $15,000 per year while extending it to include some who make more than $100,000. If he’s trying to revive compassionate conservatism, he’s not off to a great start.
I can see why some faith leaders would welcome a new opportunity for public dialogue with Ryan. Neither party has a monopoly on solutions, and Ryan’s new emphasis on the humanity and unique individual needs of people in poverty is a great improvement from his “makers versus takers” rhetoric.
But we should be very careful about playing into Ryan’s hands as he tries to rebrand himself as a compassionate wonk while still pushing harmful policies. The influence of Ayn Rand is still evident in his agenda.
add a comment »