<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 160 Million Killers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.faithinpubliclife.org/blog/160_million_killers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.faithinpubliclife.org/blog/160_million_killers/</link>
	<description>Advancing faith as a powerful force for justice, compassion and the common good.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 18:20:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.faithinpubliclife.org/blog/160_million_killers/#comment-1038</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 18:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/mywordpress/?p=1463#comment-1038</guid>
		<description>Ken,

Beck&#039;s statements weren&#039;t about public support, but rather that that 10% of Muslims are actual terrorists, which is why I considered it such a significant smear.

As Fareed Zakaria noted in his response to this claim, equating thought or speech with actual crimes is a dangerous slippery-slope that I don&#039;t think Beck actually wants to go down. That violent acts get any level of support is obviously a problem that we should be working to combat, but polls on this issue are hard to cite as definitive evidence. Surveys of Muslim populations are necessarily influenced heavily by the particular socio-political context of each country and responses to these questions have a tendency to swing significantly as conflicts change.

While helpful to give us a snapshot of public sentiment around current events, polls like these just aren&#039;t a great prediction of actual terrorism. That we only see a relatively small number of terrorist attacks per year, most of which are carried about by the same groups, is the most telling proof of this.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken,</p>
<p>Beck&#8217;s statements weren&#8217;t about public support, but rather that that 10% of Muslims are actual terrorists, which is why I considered it such a significant smear.</p>
<p>As Fareed Zakaria noted in his response to this claim, equating thought or speech with actual crimes is a dangerous slippery-slope that I don&#8217;t think Beck actually wants to go down. That violent acts get any level of support is obviously a problem that we should be working to combat, but polls on this issue are hard to cite as definitive evidence. Surveys of Muslim populations are necessarily influenced heavily by the particular socio-political context of each country and responses to these questions have a tendency to swing significantly as conflicts change.</p>
<p>While helpful to give us a snapshot of public sentiment around current events, polls like these just aren&#8217;t a great prediction of actual terrorism. That we only see a relatively small number of terrorist attacks per year, most of which are carried about by the same groups, is the most telling proof of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.faithinpubliclife.org/blog/160_million_killers/#comment-1037</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 11:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/mywordpress/?p=1463#comment-1037</guid>
		<description>When you look at the polls from muslim countries it is clear that well over 10% of their populations support terrorism.  These are facts.  Why accuse someone of anti-muslim bigotry when they are stating verifiable facts?  If you disagree with Beck, why not come up with some sort of research to refute his statements?  Oh yeah, you can&#039;t.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you look at the polls from muslim countries it is clear that well over 10% of their populations support terrorism.  These are facts.  Why accuse someone of anti-muslim bigotry when they are stating verifiable facts?  If you disagree with Beck, why not come up with some sort of research to refute his statements?  Oh yeah, you can&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
